Sure, the fact that Mr. Romney’s effective income tax rate
is considerably less than many taxpayers will, no doubt, add fuel to the fire
over whether our tax code favors wealthier Americans. The debate will continue to rage in the coming months as Congress considers extending the Bush tax cuts. In looking
at these tax breaks, policy makers must wrestle with striking the right balance
between those who work for their money and those whose money works for them. Is the code too progressive? Not progressive enough? Does it encourage investment? Or hoarding?
I can’t answer these questions because I’m biased. Frankly, my money is very lazy. It might as
well be sitting on the couch eating Cheetos and watching reality television for
all the work it does out there in the world. To some degree, though, that’s a
problem I can’t blame on the tax code. Maybe I need to employ a little tough
love, kick that money out the door and make it get a job.
At the same time, I do know that my tax dollars are working
hard (and I can see what they’re doing through the charts at http://nationalpriorities.org/). These dollars may not always be working on the
jobs I’d like, but I’m certainly proud of some of the investments I’ve made. Sometimes I forget that the end goal of
complying with the tax code shouldn’t be to hoard as much of my money as I can.
Sometimes the goal should be to make investments in our nation and its
citizens. That’s not necessarily a bad use of my dollars. It’s certainly better
than sitting on the couch and eating Cheetos.
1 comment:
Love this article! Very well written.
Post a Comment