In October 2014, the Congressional Management Foundation
(CMF) released some polling
information that provides shocking news about social media and its impact
on legislative offices. At least I thought it was shocking, but maybe that’s
because I’m old.
For the longest time, social media used to be a somewhat
challenging way to get a Congressional office’s attention, mainly because it’s
not ‘place-based.’ In other words, legislators and their staff have no way of
knowing whether the people commenting on their blogs, Facebook pages, or
Twitter accounts are constituents. And since constituents rule when it
comes to policy decisions, that meant that social media could go only so far
in influencing outcomes.
Well, that’s apparently changing. The study suggests that
the inability to separate constituent communications from those outside the
district “doesn’t really matter much to lawmakers, who see social media more as
a barometer of public opinion” (attributed to Brad Fitch, President and CEO of
CMF). As with any advocacy campaign, though, the quality of the
communications matter more than the quantity. Staffers can tell
the difference between the mass tweets encouraged by an advocacy group and the
‘real deal.’ And when it comes to the real deal, a majority of offices polled
said that even a single constituent commenting on their own was considered
influential. Even in the social media world, one personalized communication can
make a difference.
So find your legislators on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube,
LinkedIn -- whatever have you – and start commenting. Politely, please.
- Written by Stephanie Vance, Advocacy Guru
- Written by Stephanie Vance, Advocacy Guru
No comments:
Post a Comment